![]() The suit was dismissed by a California court on Wednesday, after the court determined that the image was not sexual abuse. Elden’s legal team argued that the image was taken without the consent of his parents or that it was used to exploit him in order to gain commercial advantage from it. According to Elden’s legal team, the image was taken without his parents’ knowledge or consent and was used to exploit him commercially. The lawsuit, filed in California, alleged that the video constituted child sexual abuse because Elden was only a year old when the incident occurred. He first sued Nirvana in 2013, claiming that the band’s 1991 album cover, which features a still from a home movie of him as a child, was child sexual abuse. Spencer Elden, now 24, has been a victim of child sexual abuse since 2013. Elden has until January 27th to respond to the complaint he made. They include Foo Fighters’ Dave Grohl and Krist Novoselic, Kurt Cobain’s estate’s management team, Geffen Records, and Kirk Weddle, the estate’s photographer. Elden is seeking damages of at least $150,000 (£109,000) from each of the defendants in this suit. Elden’s sex trafficking case was dismissed in an amended complaint. He has filed a claim to reinstatement on the basis that he suffered permanent emotional distress as a result of the case. His initial complaint against the band was dismissed by a judge in May. Spencer Elden, a baby on the cover of Nirvana’sNevermind album, appears on the cover of the album. However, Nirvana is not breaking any laws by featuring the image on their album cover. ![]() Some people believe that the cover is inappropriate and should not be seen by children. ![]() The cover features a naked baby boy with his privates obscured by a floating peach. ![]() Nirvana is not being sued for their album cover. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |